My Account
Shopping Cart 0 item(s)
View Cart
Facebook Google Plus LinkedIn

Curing Circuit Oscillation

Posted by Peter Hiscocks on 9/5/2017 to Technical Papers
You have built some clever analog circuit and now, when you go to check it
with an oscilloscope, you find that the output signal is a mess: not what
you expected, but a mass of oscillation riding on the output signal.

(This is one of many reasons why you need an oscilloscope to check out an
analog circuit: it is the only way to find problems like this one.  And we
have some fine scopes for that ;).

Now what?

There are, alas, a number of reasons a circuit may oscillate. If you are
unlucky, there may be more than one thing going wrong.  Fundamentally, some
signal is working its way around a complete loop, from output to input, with
a phase shift that is equal to or greater than 360 degrees, and magnitude
greater than unity.  That said, it's often not obvious which loop(s) are 
causing the problem.

You need to tackle the possible causes one at a time. It's essential to be
systematic, and it helps to keep notes of your progress - or lack of it.

Is it really oscillation?

An interfering signal, perhaps coupled into a high impedance point in the  
circuit or via some long wires, can masquerade as oscillation.  If the
signal changes dramatically when you move it or move metal objects in the  
vicinity, it may be an interfering signal.  For example, I mis-identified as
oscillation a signal that turned out to be electrical noise from a cooling
fan.  Turning off the fan instantly identified that it was the culprit.  The
solution: operate the fan from a separate supply, with its own separate

Is it likely to oscillate?

The grizzled veterans among us can eyeball a circuit and tell whether it's
likely to oscillate.  More stages inside the feedback loop, higher gain  
inside the feedback loop, cascaded sections with different bandwidths -
these are warning signs that oscillation could be a problem. Then, at the
design stage, you can be prepared: if the loop oscillates, how can we fix

Power supply decoupling.

The circuit causes an alternating current to flow in the power supply and
gound leads.  That AC current should ideally be localized to that particular
circuit, and the way to do that is with a bypass capacitor between power
supply and ground.  Always, always, always put 100nF between supply and
ground at each integrated circuit or circuit function.  Sometimes, a larger
capacitor is required.  Sometimes, a smaller capacitor is required in
addition to to the 100nF unit.

Put a large electrolytic capacitor, in parallel with 100nF, between each
supply voltage, where it enters the board, and ground.  This will minimize
the effect of the wiring impedance due to the connection between your
circuit and the bench power supply.


How did you build the circuit? On a protoboard? Those things are a wonderful
invention, and they are great for testing a small circuit that is unlikely 
to oscillate.  But the minute you see oscillation, you should be thinking  
about relocating to a copper ground plane, aka printed circuit board.  Start
with a bare copper board and then build up the circuit, dead bug style,
using soldered connections.  Solder terminal strips and banana jacks to the
board to make the input and output connections.  If the circuit involves high frequency
signals, use BNC connectors to bring the signals onto the circuit.

Some people suggest using glue to hold the components. I find that soldered
connections, using solid wire, tie the components in place well enough.

If you are building on a copper board, then you have a nice solid ground to
connect to, and that will minimize voltages that are set up by currents in
the ground plane.

Circuit Instability

You have decoupled all the circuit blocks (such as integrated circuits), you
have decoupled the power supply and the circuit is solidly mounted on a
copper PC board ground plane. And it still oscillates. Now what?
Have a look at the datasheets for the active devices used in your
circuit.  They may have important clues.  For example, power op-amps and
audio amplifiers often have an RC 'snubber' network between the output and
ground: something like 1 ohm in series with 220nF, for example.  At frequencies above
700kHz, the 1 ohm resistance appears across the output and acts with the
output resistance of the amplifier to form a voltage divider.  This reduces
the output signal high frequencies, where oscillation is likely to occur. 

There are some situations that should be an immediate red flag to a circuit
designer where oscillation is concerned. 

- Emitter followers have a tendency to oscillate.  This is
counter-intuitive, because the voltage gain of an emitter follower is less
than one.  But the emitter follower *does* have power gain, and for certain
phase conditions it will oscillate.  The solution is a resistor in the
base lead of the emitter follower: a few hundred ohms for a single emitter
follower, about 5000 ohms for a darlington pair.

- Resistor-capacitor lag (low pass) networks in the loop. Each RC lag
contributes up to 90 degrees of phase shift.  Assuming that there is a sign
change somewhere in the loop, then an additional 180 degrees of phase lag 
will cause oscillation.  These RC lag networks are often part of the 'hidden
schematic', invisible components such as stray wiring capacitance or the
collector-base capacitance of transistors.  A common technique is to bypass
the resistance with a capacitance, thereby turning the network into a
'lag-lead' network and at (least partially) cancelling the phase lag.

- Another form of the RC lag problem is a capacitive load at the output of
an op-amp.  This interacts with the output resistance of the amplifier to
create phase lag and thereby destabilize the operation of the amplifier. 
The simplest solution is to isolate the capacitance with a resistance that
is outside the feedback loop of the amplifier - if the circuit will allow
it.  If this is not possible, then a buffer amplifier between the amplier
and capacitive load may help.  There are also ways to include this 'buildout
resistance' inside the negative feedback loop, but they require some careful

Fast-Slow Compound Circuit

You have now dealt with all the 'red flag' items and the circuit still
oscillates.  Here's an insight that I learned from Jim Williams: a circuit
will oscillate if the feedback loop includes two stages and the first stage
is much faster (greater bandwidth) than the second stage.  This is a very 
common situation, for example, where a relatively fast op-amp drives a power
amplifier stage containing high-current power transistors.  The power
transistors have a much lower bandwidth.  When a correction signal arrives
at the op-amp, it attempts to adjust the output via the buffer amplifier.
But because the buffer is slow, the op-amp overshoots on its output signal.
Then it belatedly detects the overshoot at the output of the buffer and
tries to correct in the opposite direction, again overshooting. The result
is oscillation.

In conceptual terms, the solution is very simple. Speed up the buffer stage
or slow down the op-amp.  In general, speeding up the buffer stage is not an
option, so the op-amp must be slowed down to the point where the buffer can
accurately track the op-amp output.  Often, it is sufficient to put a small
capacitor between the inverting input and the output of the op-amp.  This  
makes the op-amp behave as an integrator for fast signals, reducing the slew
rate for a step and reducing the AC gain for a sine wave.  This doesn't
always work perfectly: the capacitor adds phase shift as well as reducing
gain, so it may not be a perfect solution.  For example, it is sometimes
advantageous to put a resistance in series with this feedback capacitance.
Then at high frequencies, where the feedback capacitor is small compared to
this resistance, the amplifier gain is reduced by the resistance.

To find the optimum value for this resistance, you may need to do a more
detailed analysis or use circuit simulation.

Too Much Gain at High Frequencies

The output snubber network and the fast-slow compensation capacitor both
work by reducing the gain of an op-amp at high frequencies. There is another
technique that can be very effective: a resistor-capacitor network between 
the input pins of an op-amp, to reduce the so-called 'noise gain'.

The shunt resistor across the input acts to form a voltage divider with the
feedback resistors.  For example, if the feedback resistance is 1k and the
shunt resistance is 100 ohms, then the loop gain is reduced by a factor of
10.  We want this gain reduction not to occur at low frequencies, so the  
shunt resistor is placed in series with a capacitor.  At high frequencies,
the capacitor becomes a short circuit and the shunt resistor comes into   
effect. For example, if the oscillation is occurring at 1MHz, then choose 
the resistor and capacitor to become effective at, say, 1kHz. Again,
simulation may help to optimize this circuit.


Circuit simulation (like LTSpice) is a wonderful tool, and it can be very
useful in exploring circuit stability. However, there are some caveats. 

- The accuracy of the simulation depends on the accuracy of the circuit
model.  For example, we recently worked on a power op-amp circuit that
displayed oscillation when sinking current, but not when sourcing current.
That behaviour did not show up in the circuit model.

- Circuit simulation is of no help diagnosing grounding and power supply
problems because the inductance and capacitances of the wiring are generally
not known. They are part of the 'hidden schematic'.

- A circuit simulator does not suggest solutions to a problem. (Hey, Pete, I
think you should increase the phase margin of the second stage of this
circuit by adding a lead-lag network.) There may come a day when circuit
simulators have that capability, but we're not there yet. Consequently, you
need to have some ideas of Things To Try, and hopefully the points given  
above will provide a starting point.

Simulation is no substitute for building a prototype and testing it

Try stuff to see what happens

Sometimes, it can be difficult to tell where to direct attention in the
circuit. If it's a large loop with several components, is there one
location where a fix can be applied? Well, try stuff. Place a capacitor
around one of the op-amps in the circuit and see if that has an effect. No
effect? Then try some other part of the circuit. Sometimes, making things
worse is a valuable clue where the problem lies.

It's stable! Now test it to be sure.

After hours of work, the circuit has been tamed. It does what it should do,
and does not oscillate. Are we done? No. The circuit could be marginally  
stable and some change in the circuit - component drift, temperature
dependence, power supply sensitivity - could send it back into oscillation.
Now you need to inject a transient signal into the system and see how it  
responds. The degree of overshoot and ringing indicates the stability of the
system - technically, the gain and phase margin. You want an overdamped or 
slightly underdamped response: multiple overshoots and ringing indicate that
the system is dangerously close to instability. Conversely, you may find
that yes, you've killed the oscillation, but the step response is terribly
slow. So maybe you can lighten the compensation networks - usually, this 
means reducing a compensation capacitance somewhere.

Bode Plots, Gain and Phase Margin

It's very useful to understand the concepts behind stability in negative
feedback systems. By all means, learn how to interpret open-loop and closed
loop gain plots, and how these techniques I have discussed appear on these
plots. Together with a simulation, these techniques can give you a very   
clear idea why a given circuit is unstable.

An example: Years ago, I built a regulated power supply, using an op-amp for
negative feedback. It oscillated. I tried various ad-hoc fixes and nothing 
worked. Finally, I consulted one of the local experts on negative feedback.
His advice: You need to construct a Bode plot and engineer a solution
properly. Somewhat chastised, I did as he advised. The Bode plot solution
suggested a feedback capacitor and resistor of certain values. Without much
hope, I installed those components in the circuit and lo, the oscillation 
went away.

So the ad-hoc methods I have described above are some help and can sometimes
lead to a quick solution, but be prepared to do a proper analysis if they  
don't work.

We recently debugged oscillation problems in a new product. The protoboard
circuit oscillated and did not yeild to simple fixes, so we moved the
circuit to a copper PC board. The copper board version seemed to be more
stable and it was certainly easier to work on.

We found:

- an oscillating darlington transistor, cured with a resistor in the base
- two fast-slow feedback loops that could be tamed by slowing down the fast
- one power-op amp stage that (per the datasheet) required a snubbing network
on the output. Simulation indicated that a noise gain network and a series  
RC local feedback network would be required to make it stable. That turned  
out to be the case.
- an RC lag network that could be compensated with a lead capacitor.

Now it's stable, and we have confidence in the circuit based on transient
tests with worst-case capacitor loads attached.

Share |

 Technical Papers

 The Single Channel Oscilloscope
 Curing Circuit Oscillation
 Testing a Selenium Rectifier
 Yes, we test IGBTs
 Negative Tracking Power Supply

 September 2017
 October 2016
 June 2016
 March 2016
 January 2016
 August 2015
 July 2015
 May 2015
 February 2015
 January 2015
 October 2014
 September 2014
 June 2014
 March 2014
 February 2014
 September 2013
 July 2013
 April 2012
 February 2012
 January 2012
 October 2011
 September 2011
 June 2011
 March 2011
 January 2011
 December 2010
 October 2010
 September 2010
 May 2010
 April 2010
 December 2009
 November 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 December 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 June 2008
 May 2008
 March 2008
 February 2008
 September 2007
 August 2007
 July 2007
 June 2007
 October 2006
 September 2006
 July 2006
 May 2006
 March 2006