My Account
Shopping Cart 0 item(s)
View Cart
Facebook Google Plus LinkedIn

Stand-alone versus Tethered Oscilloscopes

Posted by Peter Hiscocks on 2/4/2014 to Technical Papers
An engineering friend asked me when Syscomp would have an instrument with a built-in screen, the self-contained scope. Well, never say never, but as it is, we like the having a separate instrument box - a tethered scope - using a laptop (or desktop) for the display. Why?  Two reasons: display resolution and operating convenience.

For example, the display of a handheld scope with built in screen might be 320x240 pixels. A typical laptop computer (eg, Toshiba Satellite L500D) has a screen resolution of 1366x768 pixels.  A desktop display might be 1920x1080 or higher. Detail - such as the complexity in our network analyser display shown below - is much clearer on the laptop and desktop displays, and the screens can contain much more readout information without being cluttered.

VNA Screenshot

The display is much more versatile - you can separate and hide various components of the display, and for classroom use, you can output the display to a projector.

How about operating convenience? The mechanical controls of a vintage oscilloscope were very convenient to operate. Need to change the timebase? Twist the knob. Change the trigger setting? Press on a button.

Old Plugin Scope

But those mechanical controls are really expensive, really big, and a major source of unreliable operation. So replacing them by a software equivalent is very attractive.

How do you provide these controls on a self-contained handheld scope?  Typically, with a few pushbutton cursor controls and a heirarchy of menus.  This is fine for occasional operation, but it becomes really tedious if you need to switch back and forth between setting the amplitude sensitivity, changing the trigger settings and the adjusting the timebase, for example.

On the larger screen of a tethered scope, you can operate the controls with a mouse or trackpad. Point and click, or point and drag. It's as convenient as using mechanical controls.

CGR-101 Graphic User Interface

Incidentally, should you be inclined to tinker with the software, it's easy to do on this tethered scope - just modify the source code with a text editor and rerun the program.

If you need to take waveform measurements while at the end of a ladder or inside a confined space, it may make sense to use a self-contained scope - especially if you don't have to adjust the settings frequently. But for circuit development and testing work in a lab, a tethered scope - like the popular CGR-101 and CGM-101 - are our preference for the quality of the display and the operating convenience.
Share |

 Technical Papers

 The Single Channel Oscilloscope
 Curing Circuit Oscillation
 Testing a Selenium Rectifier
 Yes, we test IGBTs
 Negative Tracking Power Supply

 September 2017
 October 2016
 June 2016
 March 2016
 January 2016
 August 2015
 July 2015
 May 2015
 February 2015
 January 2015
 October 2014
 September 2014
 June 2014
 March 2014
 February 2014
 September 2013
 July 2013
 April 2012
 February 2012
 January 2012
 October 2011
 September 2011
 June 2011
 March 2011
 January 2011
 December 2010
 October 2010
 September 2010
 May 2010
 April 2010
 December 2009
 November 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 December 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 June 2008
 May 2008
 March 2008
 February 2008
 September 2007
 August 2007
 July 2007
 June 2007
 October 2006
 September 2006
 July 2006
 May 2006
 March 2006